Plot
A small group of scientists and soldiers band together in an underground missile
silo as the world above them is overrun by the zombies. The scientists are
trying study the zombies in order to find a way to either kill them or control
them. But the soldiers just want them dead. This leads to tension and conflict
between the two groups with the threat of the zombies ever-present.
Review
I was skeptical when the remake for Dawn of the Dead
was announced a few years ago. Well I'd be lying if I said skeptical, more like
raging mad. How could you remake such a classic film and be able to top it? Well
to my absolute delight, the remake was superb. It still wasn't anywhere near as
good as the original however it was one of the best mainstream horror films I've
seen for a very long time. It was terrifying, it was gory, it was funny and
above all it had heart with characters we could sympathise with and a story that
tried to establish itself as real as possible. So when a remake (or re-imagining
as it calls itself) of Day of the Dead was announced, I was more upbeat
and expecting more of the same. Out of the two original films, Day of the
Dead was always the one that needed the remake more so I was preparing
myself for a treat. Ving Rhames joined the cast (not playing the same role as he
did before though!) and Steve Miner, a man who has helmed a few horror films in
his time such as a couple of the early Friday the 13th films,
Halloween H20 and Lake Placid, was announced as the director. So far
so good. So where did it all go horribly wrong?
Day of the Dead is a dreadful rehash, more at
home with the last couple of Return of the Living Dead sequels and
House of the Dead 2: Dead Aim than it is with either the original Day of the
Dead or the remake of Dawn of the Dead. It would have worked better
as a sequel as opposed to a standalone remake. But even then, the "remake" term
can be applied very loosely. The writer, Jeffrey Reddick, has picked out the
bits of the original he wanted to throw in (i.e. not a whole lot), peppered it
with bits and bobs from other zombie films and tried to hold it all together
under the banner of a remake. The
problem isn't that film is low budget - far from it. It was supposed to get a
cinematic release but didn't because obviously someone higher up in the studio
saw the final cut and recognised a turd when they saw one. I can understand that
the zombie genre has been so over-used and watered down over recent years and
that you can only do so much with the living dead....however some films have
managed to do something new with them (see Zombie Strippers as proof).
The set up is from the book of zombie writing - military tries to contain a
virus but it manages to spread to the civilian population. The film kicks off
about twenty minutes in when the hospital turns into a zombie breeding ground.
But after a relatively entertaining couple of minutes, the film just drifts into
cliché territory with the characters going from one situation to the next and
encountering problems along the way (you know the sort - trying to get to a
parked car, then finally getting there after battling zombies to find there are
no keys, etc). Quite what Ving Rhames is doing in this is beyond me. Maybe he
thought he was signing on for a proper sequel to Dawn of the Dead. Mena
Suvari does what little she can with her thankless role as the soldier with
feelings and emotions but it's pointless because the characters are second
fiddle to the zombies.
Zombies are a touchy subject with most horror fans.
I prefer the slow lumbering zombies of the early Romero days, not these hyped up
sprinters from 28 Days Later and Dawn of the Dead. The slow menace
of hundreds of zombies dragging their feet towards you is more scary than the
thought of some rabid-looking guy beating the 100m world record to get to your
flesh! But the zombies are taken to the next level here. It's like they've all
watched The Matrix. They can jump 20ft into the air. They can crawl
across walls and ceilings like aliens. And whenever they attack, the camera goes
into a music video-like frenzy of flashes and editing, supposedly to enhance the
impact of people being ripped apart. Most of the gore effects are CGI and it
begs the question on how much fake blood and prosthetics have gone up in price
for filmmakers to be suddenly avoiding them. Bring back Tom Savini and his box
of tricks. Computer game gore and dozens of ripped limbs and torn throats are
not replacements for a decent story, dependable characters and an odd scare or
two.
Verdict
Day of the Dead is a terrible zombie film. It
offers nothing remotely original and simply rehashes tired zombie clichés whilst
cashing it's name against the undisputed titans of the zombie sub-genre. It's
such a disappointment given the names involved and the budget. What should have
been a win-win scenario has turned into a suck-suck scenario. Day of the Dead
is a disasterpiece of epic proportions.