Plot
Two dim-witted detectives try to catch a
serial killer who is stalking a rural Texas drive-in theatre and randomly
killing people with a samurai sword.
Review
Ah the days of the 70s where you could go and watch
a bunch of low rent horror films at your local drive-in.........well I'm
guessing they were the days since I wasn't born then nor do I live in America
where the drive-in was most popular. The thought of it is appealing to a low
budget horror fan like myself and I could imagine being sat inside a car in the
middle of nowhere watching some terrible slasher film like Drive-In Massacre
on a big screen. Quite why anyone would want to show Drive-In Massacre at
a drive-in is almost as bad as getting a firm specializing in bathrooms to use
Psycho as some form of promotional tool or a beach resort publicizes
itself using Jaws.
A great opening scene promises much but
unfortunately this much-maligned horror doesn't deliver when it counts and is
very slow and plodding. It's main problem is that the film shifts away from the
murders and the drive-in and places the focus of the film onto the two
dim-witted detectives. Granted these two characters provide their own fair share
of amusing moments (one of them has to dress as a woman so they can pose as a
couple and lure the killer out into the open) but there's way too many scenes of
them talking, driving and sitting down eating donuts. This is one of the film's weaknesses
overall as it fails to really build any characters whatsoever. We're introduced
to the simple cleaner/janitor of the drive-in and the way-too-angry drive-in
manager, as well as some pervert who likes watching couples make out so he "beat
his meat." But that's it. There's no connection with any of the characters at
all. Dare I say it, but surely the film could have made a group of horny
teenagers the focus of the film and had them all work at the drive-in or
frequent it so that at least there would be some sort of link with the audience. The lack of characters means
that there's very few options to pinpointing who the killer is. It's either
character a, b or c. The messy ending doesn't really expand on the killer
either. I had no idea who was the killer
or why he did it - the film just ends with the death of one of the minor
characters introduced. It's all very random but having said that, at least the
ending is a little different to normal as the killer doesn't meet the usual
demise.
There's also an extended scene where the cops
pursue a man through a warehouse which has little relevance to the overall
proceedings. With a slender running time of seventy eight minutes, it's blatant
filler on behalf of the script. The
death scenes are pretty
graphic though and some decapitations early in the film are really brutal for
1976. Unfortunately the film deals it's best make-up effects early on so there's
nothing to build up to later and the rest of the kills are just basic sword
stabbings. It's hardly a massacre too with eight people meeting their makers -
I've seen worse in things like Beverly Hills Cop! The lighting and sound
leaves a lot to be desired too. I know the film is supposed to be dark as it's
set in a drive-in but this place is pitch black. It's frustrating for the viewer
because although we expect it to be realistic, we've still paid to see a film
and we want to see stuff happening! The sound is bog standard mono and sounds
almost as bad as some of the noise coming from whatever is showing in-film on
the drive-in screen..
Verdict
Drive-In Massacre was
clearly an early prototype for the slasher but overall it's a mess. A
couple of interesting and amusing moments doesn't make the time go very
quickly. This is one cheap drive-in that you're best driving past.