|
Menu
|
|
Dr Terror's House of Horrors (1965)
Plot
Five strangers board a train and are joined by a mysterious fortune teller who
offers to read their Tarot cards. Each man has a different story to tell
including an architect who returns to his ancestral home to find a werewolf out
for revenge, a doctor who finds out his wife is a vampire, a huge plant which
traps the occupants of a house inside, a musician who gets involved in voodoo
and an art critic who is tormented by the severed hand of a famous artist.
Review
As with many of my other reviews for Amicus films, I always start off with the
point that they tried to rival Hammer as far as British horror went but never really
managed to compete consistently with them. However they did find their niche in
the genre, in particular the horror anthology. Dr Terror's House of Horrors is their
best one and it's probably coincidental that it was their first one too.
Inspired by the black humour-filled E.C. comics of the 50s, Dr Terror's House
of Horrors was to set off Amicus' long-standing obsession with making horror
anthologies. It was a successful formula as long as most of the stories in them
were entertaining. You were always going to get some clunkers but with the array
of acting talent that Amicus managed to get to appear in small roles, it was a
price worth paying. Peter Cushing stars as Dr Schreck, the sinister fortune
teller who forms the wrap around story for this one. He draws you to the screen
the moment he arrives because you don't know his true motives. He seems friendly
enough but why are all of his predictions so nasty? He reads each of the
characters their fortune which in turn become the separate stories. Then right
at the end there's a devilish twist as the doc reveals his true motives.The first story is your basic
werewolf story where some people are killed by a werewolf but no one knows who
the it is until the twist ending. Like many other werewolf stories, it's
pretty flat and there's little to get excited about. You don't actually see anyone in
make-up, simply a mean-looking dog which growls at the camera. Running in at
around fifteen minutes, the story isn't too long and drawn out and is harmless
enough, if a little predictable. Thankfully it's got the best atmosphere of the
film and the entire segment is played straight which at least adds a little
credibility. The second story owes a lot to
Day of the Triffids (to which director Freddie Francis directed extra
footage) in which a plant begins to grow and develop a taste for killing. It
seems a little absurd at times and does drift off towards being pure camp and
that's because the idea isn't explained very well. The story doesn't run for
too long which is probably a good thing as the "special effects" get a little
silly - it's simply a plant of the end of a piece of wire being wriggled
around in front of the camera! Come on, you didn't expect technical wizardry
did you? Bernard Lee, more famous known as 'M' from the James Bond films,
makes an appearance here. The third story once again fails
to excite as Donald Sutherland believes that his wife is a vampire. It follows
the same vampire storyline that most of the other genre films have done and,
like the werewolf one, is pretty dull and lifeless as a result. The only saving
grace is the final twist to the tale which is laughable but you've got to feel
sorry for Sutherland's character for being so gullible and dumb all along. The fourth one is to do with
voodoo and has the presence of Roy Castle for some comic relief but he just
ends up irritating the hell out of the viewer as a musician who heads to the
West Indies and mistakenly copies the notes from a voodoo dance with dire
consequences. Castle can't act and his comedy routine, not to mention an
obligatory musical number, in this segment is really
out of place with the material. What could have been the most serious of the
segments turns into a bit of a variety show mess. The fifth story is the best by
far and stars Christopher Lee (coincidence? I think not!) as a rather bitter art
critic who unfairly criticises the work of an artist and humiliates him in
public, only for the artist to embarrass him back with a prank. So Lee gets
bitter and runs him over, causing the artist to lose his hand. But the hand
won't go away and keeps haunting Lee's character. Lee is at his best here,
playing the obnoxious, sneering critic with a sharp tongue. He oozes charisma yet again and
his suitably oily performance is matched by Michael Gough, another veteran of
the British horror genre at the time. The effects for the severed hand are
convincing enough (this is not just one of the crew putting his hand up from
behind a cushion!) and there are a few moments of shocks to compliment it
nicely.
Verdict
Dr Terror's House of Horrors has dated quite a bit by now and as a
result, it's not
going to keep you up at night. But with some great performances by THE
best actors this genre has to offer as well as one or two unnerving moments, you can do
no harm by having your fortune read by the doc. |