Plot
Peggy, a young woman recovering from a nervous breakdown,
is attacked by a one-armed man in her house but no evidence is found and no one
believes her story, merely blaming it on her state of mind. Her new husband is
offered a new job at a rural boarding school and she moves with him to the
country. There they meet the rather eccentric headmaster and his wife. However
things soon take a turn for the worse when she believes that the one-armed man
has followed her.
Review
Hammer are more famous for their classic Gothic
horrors but they did dabble in other genres such as the fantasy genre with the
likes of The Lost Continent and One Million Years B.C. What are
usually forgotten or glossed over are there numerous forays into the
Hitchcockian-style thriller
that they did in the early 70s. None of which are particularly memorable
but are at least curious companions to their more lavish horror counterparts. It
was around this time that Hammer had begun to emphasize gore and nudity a lot
more in an attempt to keep their films fresh and get back some of their lost
popularity. Fear in the Night was an attempt by the studio to head in a
new direction. Ironically enough this "new direction" was to hark back to it's
golden era where atmosphere and suspense were the name of the game, not blood
and boobs.
Unfortunately this one relies a little too much on
creating the atmosphere and suspense and forgets to do anything with it.
Director Jimmy Sangster was responsible for two of
Hammer's worst horror films but redeems himself somewhat with a solid effort
which keeps it's cards close to it's chest for as long as it can. This can be a
little distracting for the viewer - each character is seemingly hiding some
secret which would reveal more about the plot twist but they are kept hidden for as long as
possible. Whilst this allows for an interesting pay-off, the route leading to it
seems plodding and rather distant from the viewer. Usually thrillers keep you
hooked with little tidbits of information but Fear in the Night refuses
to play by the rules. You're either going to switch off in confusion (or
boredom) before the
finale or stick with it in the hope that the script will play it's cards at some
point. Having said that, the finale isn't overly thrilling although there's a
prolonged ten-minute stalking sequence through the creepy, desolate school.
Hammer was always great at setting their films in eerie locations and this
remote schoolhouse is one of their best complete with empty classrooms and huge
white sheets covering over furniture in others. Tape recorders play the noise of
children yet there are no pupils to be seen anywhere. And the opening shot of a
slow pan across the school grounds to reveal the legs of a man hanging from a
tree is a rather startling image.
Can you go wrong with Peter
Cushing as a rather nutty headmaster? I don't think so. This was Cushing's first
film after the death of his wife and he looks rather detached from proceedings
but this works in his favour as the character has a lot of sinister secrets to
keep hidden. The fact that his character only has one arm isn't kept in the dark
and one of the first encounters he has with Peggy where he stands behind her to
help her untie her scarf is excellent - we see that he has a prosthetic arm but
she does not. Joan Collins has made a career out of playing bitchy women in film
and television and her role here is no exception. She plays, well a bitch, and
is one of the stronger performers on display and it's a shame she's not in the
film more than she is. Judy Geeson is attractive and likeable in the lead role
as the long-suffering woman who no one believes. She's not the best actress I've
seen but the role requires more sympathy and support from the audience than it
does admiration and she fits this bill. Ralph Bates, the man Hammer tried to
groom as their next leading man, is as weak as he was in the other Hammer films
he starred in. Bates isn't a bad actor and delivers his lines well, it's just
that he has little screen presence or charisma to really get into any of the
roles he plays. Whilst the cast are all very well-equipped in their roles, this
is arguably the film's weakness - there's just too few people around! Like the
Scooby Doo cartoons where the ghoul/ghost/monster was always the only
other person introduced in the episode apart from the gang, Fear in the Night
attempts to keep us guessing with the murder-mystery story but it's blatantly
obvious who it's going to be from the start. It's the only possible outcome to
the film as there are so few suspects lurking around the school grounds.
Verdict
Fear in the Night
was a brave attempt by Hammer to go in a new direction but ultimately fails
because even in 1972, the plot twists weren't new or original in the slightest.
It's entertaining enough if you want to stick it out but it will never be
regarded as one of Hammer's better films.