Plot
Jason Crockett is a disabled millionaire who invites his
family to his birthday celebrations on his private island in the middle of a
lake. Two of his family cross paths with
freelance photographer Pickett Smith who is doing a pollution survey for an
ecology magazine. Crockett hates nature and poisons and exterminates any
creatures that is on his property. However it seems that the poison has had an
adverse effect on nature and on his birthday night, the frogs and other
creatures decide to get their revenge.
Review
I can see how this obscure 1972 film has certain horror fans
foaming at the mouth. It's one of those films that can either be labeled "so
bad, it's good" or "so bad, it's horrific." Opinion seems to be divided but I'm
definitely in the camp of the latter. It sucks so bad that it really is a
complete chore to sit through no matter how cheesy and absurd
the idea of killer frogs could be. Your patience for the worst kind of trashy
nonsense will be put to the ultimate test should you dare rise to the challenge
and sit and watch this.
Like any true to form slasher film (yes that's right, slasher
film - because the way the film runs, you could quite easily substitute the
animals for a guy in a mask), Frogs follows a bland routine
of mundane dialogue, death, mundane dialogue, death, etc. There's not a whole lot of linking
anything together, just plenty of bickering between the family members followed
up by someone walking off to their death. I think the problem
is that everyone in the film plays it straight. Even the script doesn't throw in
any gags. Could anyone really have taken the film this seriously when they were
making it?
The frogs don't actually do anything during the film
except appear every two or three minutes after a scene of dialogue. There's
plenty of stock footage of them croaking and leading the charge but not a lot
else. Actually there's plenty of stock footage here generally - snakes, spiders,
crocodiles and lizards all get their moments to shine and most of their shining
is done by stock footage. The way they each kill off their victims is about as
cheesy as you can get. The spiders cocoon an injured handyman in the forest and bear in
mind that these are only small tarantulas, not giant monsters. The lizards are
even smarter as they knock off bottles of poison in the greenhouse and fumigate
another of the rich people with their own weapons. Bear in
mind that the bottles do actually say poison on them so why anyone would keep
them on the top shelf of a creaky wooden fixture is beyond me. These
people are either unlucky or terribly stupid (and that's not just because they
decided to star in this). Another schmuck is fed to the crocodiles. But the
manner in which these scenes are filmed is just appalling and I could not even
comprehend trying to leave my brain in check to watch someone killed in these
ways. It's just utterly stupid.
The positive, and I repeat
the positive is that the cinematography is great. This isolated mansion
looks just that and the surrounding swamps and forests drip with slime - you can
almost smell how bad they are. You do get the sense that this bunch of
characters are in the middle of nowhere and miles away from help. Oh yeah and
the film stars a very young Sam Elliott, who would eventually find fame in the
movies just portraying grumpy Texans.
Verdict
Frogs is one of the most dire films I've ever seen.
Even the money shots of people being attacked by animals are so ridiculously
concocted that it's hard to believe.