Plot
A former missionary to India keeps his crazed, cannibalistic son locked away in the attic of his
country house in order to keep him from killing to eat. When a group of people
in a cross-country race stop off at the house, it is only a matter of time
before the son escapes to feed.
Review
British horror in the 70s was at its lowest point. Hammer and Amicus had been
churning out the same horrors for years with dwindling results and a new breed
of horror was emerging from America with the likes of Night of the Living
Dead, The Exorcist and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Audiences didn't
want to keep watching Dracula, Frankenstein or other monsters stalking victims
through Gothic settings. Some people foolishly stuck to the formula that had
brought about the greatest success in the hope that people would eventually come
full circle again but all it did was expose how poor and one-dimensional the
films had become. Tyburn Films was a new studio established by Kevin Francis,
son of horror director Freddie Francis, that attempted to replicate the Hammer
formula at a time when everyone else was trying not to replicate it. What we got
was a handful of competently-made but ultimately weak and feeble horror outings
that may have scared people back in the early 60s but looked woefully short of
imagination and scares in the mid-70s. The Ghoul is one such outing.
The Ghoul might as well have begun with characters saying
"been there, done that and got the t-shirt" because it's so routine,
unimaginative and uneventful.
The story itself is very thin and it plods along way
too slowly to do anything effective. There's lots of padding early on with the
antics of the racers taking up the bulk of the early running time. Even when
they do get to the country house, they spend too much time doing very little of
note. Freddie Francis' direction is competent but so devoid of energy and life.
He lets the film play out like an elongated sketch that should have been short
and snappy but was dragged out to full feature-length levels. Whilst the film is
well shot, with plenty of fog-drenched moors and remote locations, it just
doesn't do anything with it. There's no atmosphere, no sense of dread or
foreboding or worthwhile build-up to the eventual reveal of the cannibal. Typically of old school horror films, the monster
isn't revealed until the very end of the film and its no surprise to find out
that it's a big let down. The 'ghoul' of the
title is simply a man with a bit of green paint on his face. It's hardly going
to make you wet your pants, especially as he looks to be wearing a huge nappy
and waddles across the floor like he has just done something naughty in it.
It's a shame because it's got good pedigree with
the cast and crew: director Freddie Francis
is a British horror legend, helming some of Amicus' most popular anthology films
as well as a few Hammer films; writer Anthony Hinds produced some of Hammer's
best early outings; both Peter Cushing (no introduction needed!) and Veronica
Carlson starred in their fair share of Hammer horrors; John Hurt would shoot to
fame when an alien burst out of his chest a few years later in Alien; and
Ian McCullough starred in his fair share of late 70s/early 80s Italian
exploitation horrors. Cushing does what he does best and that's improve the
watchability of any rubbish film by an extra star. This was three years on from
the death of his wife, from which he never really recovered, and apparently he
broke down a few times during filming. It's not one of his best performances, if
you can it that, as he seems to be portraying himself - a heartbroken man full
of grief and mourning. He chose the right character to play but probably at the
wrong time. John Hurt pops up as the crazy gardener
Verdict
The Ghoul isn't going to win any horror awards with it's pedestrian,
lifeless formula being about ten years out of date. It's harmless enough but
just a chore to sit through the same old, same old time and time again.