Plot
Seven college students desperate to
raise their grades are invited to
spend a weekend on the island of reclusive Vincent King in order to study the
wildlife. But it isn't long before the students
realise that they are being filmed as part of a snuff film and killed off in
grisly ways.
Review
Hack! has me split right down the
middle. On one hand it's just an 89 minute long name-check of horror films and
characters with no regard for originality, in fact even embracing it's shameless
ripping of some superior films. There's only so much of this that I can take. On
the other hand, it rips off so much that it ends up becoming mildly entertaining
to see which film is going to be next for the copycat treatment. Hack!
will not appeal to everyone - hell I don't even know myself. The post-modern
horror thing of characters quoting fiction-in-fiction has been done to death
since Scream set the benchmark and this one isn't going to change that.
However a decent cast and lots of gore save the rather messy script from cutting
itself too loose.
The plot is wafer-thin or at
least the whole college scenario to get the characters onto the island is. Do we
really need to have college students as the characters? Why not just a group of
friends? The reason is obvious - we get to receive our token cut-out characters
ranging from the jock who wants to play football, the nerdy bookworm to the hot
foreign student and the token straight-laced hero. It insults me to continually
see the same characters rolled out film after film. The worst thing is that a
lot of films play on the stereotypes to make you think that different things
will happen to them but 90% of the time it's the same end result (the black guy
dies early, the slut is usually killed just after having sex with the jock, the
bookworm falls in love with the token straight-laced hero, etc, etc). There is a
little tweaking around with the end result of each character here with the
exception of one ***(Spoiler - the hot, slutty chick who gets naked actually
survives for a change!)** With clichéd characters and a script that has them
doing highly original things like drinking, acting like dicks and having
pre-marital sex, it is no surprise that almost the entire first half of the film
is unwatchable. It just goes through the slasher motions in order to set up the
final third. But it's when the film shifts gears in the final third that it
manages to pick up steam. The script doesn't make any sense at the best of times
with so many twists and turns throughout that it's best not to think about who
is who. But at least when the killing begins, there's plenty of blood flowing
around to make it seem worthwhile.
I lost count at the amount of
name-checking the film does. It really annoys me to no end to see writers do
things like this without any other purpose than to say "look at us, we saw all
of the movies we mentioned." Films like Hellraiser, Saw, Jaws (the
boat is named Orca), Frankenstein, The Birds and House of 1,000
Corpses are mentioned. We characters ranging from Hannibal Lecter to Freddy
being discussed. Even actors and directors like Rob Zombie and Boris Karloff get
the treatment. What about the characters' names in here like Vincent King
(Vincent Price + Stephen King?), Mary Shelly (a no-brainer every horror fan
should recognise), Sheriff Bates (Psycho anyone?) and so on. Dialogue is
also lifted from many films including infamous lines like "The Truth? You can't
handle the truth!" and "You're gonna need a bigger boat." Do they serve any
purpose? Nope. Most of the time they just sound weird and are completely out of
context with what the characters have been doing or saying. The names in the
cast also provide little more than excuses to pad out the front cover with
"stars" like Tony Burton (Duke, the trainer from the Rocky films), Burt
Young (Paulie from the Rocky films - do I sense a theme?) and William
Forsythe (loads of cheap jack crap but more recently any Rob Zombie film). I
also recognised Sean Kanan from The Karate Kid Part III and they throw in
a little gag about it in here too. Gabrielle Richens provides the token nudity
(the film actually gets the hottest chick naked for a change!).
Verdict
If you've had your fill of
self-referencing slasher films (and let's face it, who hasn't?) then maybe
Hack! isn't for you. But it'd make a good drinking game to sit through this
and have a shot of your drink of choice for every horror film that gets name-checked or referenced at
some point - you'll be long gone before they even get to the island.