Plot
Posing as a librarian, vampire hunter Jonathan Harker travels to Castle Dracula where he intends to
kill Dracula and end his vampiric legacy. But the sun sets
before he can do it and Dracula manages to bite him. His book and diary are
found by his friend, Dr Van Helsing who then stakes Harker to make sure he won't
come back as a vampire. But Dracula wants revenge for his attempted
assassination and preys upon Lucy, Harker's fiancé. Dr Van Helsing teams up with
her brother, Arthur, to try and put an end to Dracula before she fully turns.
Review
The ball had started rolling for Hammer's glorious
technicolour reinvention of horror cinema a year earlier with The Curse of Frankenstein but it was
Horror of Dracula which cemented the legacy of the studio and marked the
beginning of their
dominance over the horror genre for the next two decades. There was a reason that
the Universal films had died out in the 40s and that was because audiences had grown tired
of seeing Bela Lugosi prance around in a daft cape and turn into a
bat-on-a-string. So it was a risky move for Hammer to test the waters and see if
audiences were ready for a new breed of Dracula. Brought into the then-modern era with lavish and
exotic colour to give realism to everything, Horror of Dracula
marks a far cry from the black and white days of old. This was Dracula like
audiences had never seen before and it changed the face of horror cinema
forever.
Horror of Dracula is a groundbreaking film
not just for screen vampires but for horror in general. Taboo subjects back in
the day were thrust into the spotlight with graphic violence and sexual
undertones, once only suggested in the original Dracula films, now receiving
centre stage. It may look tame nowadays but back in 1958 this was shocking
material. The link between vampirism and eroticism is common nature in cinema
now. Quite frankly it would be virtually impossible to separate the two and they
have become bound by time. Say vampire to anyone and they would conjure up the
exact images that this film presents - that of the tall, dark and handsome
vampire who seduces young women and then drinks their blood. This is the film
which gave birth to this vision. The previous Universal Dracula never even
skirted the issues. This one confronts them head on. Christopher Lee smashed preconceptions of how
Dracula was to be portrayed. Instead of Bela Lugosi's hammy Count with his high
collars and greased back hair, Lee's Dracula is ripped right from the book. One
moment he is a perfect gentleman with manners and courtesy, the next moment he
is transformed into an almost-rabid monster, displays raw, animalistic instincts
like never before. He possesses a more sexual, sinister element and this erotic
tone, skirted over in the Lugosi Dracula films, is now brought to the fore.
Dracula is now predator-like, stalking his sweet and innocent virginal victims
before turning them into wild, aggressive vampires with the same sexual desires
and needs as he. The shock value has greatly diminished over the years as this
has become the norm for vampires. But back in 1958, this was something shocking
to behold. Female characters sit waiting for Dracula with plunging night gowns
which do little more than cover over anything that would have led to the film
being banned. Lee's physical attributes are key to the character's success.
Tall, imposing and handsome, Lee looks everything like a dashing nobleman. It's
funny to note that he has little screen time and few lines but such is the
impression his character makes, you would think he was present in every scene.
It's a mesmerizing performance and there's little wonder that Lee's portrayal
(in this one at least) is consistently labeled as the best Dracula to have ever
hit the big screen. There can be little argument with that.
Let's not forget Peter Cushing. His Van Helsing
brings all of Cushing's calm, intelligence and wit to the role and is the
perfect foil to Lee's Dracula. With Lee not having much to say, a lot of the
impact of the film and the events that unfold is down to Cushing and his
performance. He balances religion and science, bringing credibility to the
vampire threat and enhancing the role of Dracula as a bringer of death and
destruction. In many of the portrayals since this, Van Helsing is seen as
somewhat of a lesser adversary to Dracula but not here. Van Helsing is on a
equal playing field and the two are well matched. One only needs to watch the
gripping finale as Van Helsing and Dracula tussle through the castle,
culminating in a memorable finale as Van Helsing pulls out all of the tricks in
his book to try and kill Dracula once and for all. It's a finale which none of
the following sequels even came close to beating.
As well as the two legendary main stars, the main men behind-the-scenes from The Curse of Frankenstein
were all back on board to try and do the same with Dracula. Director Terence
Fisher, writer Jimmy Sangster and composer James Bernard all contribute some of
their best work here. Fisher's direction is assured, pacing the film well and
keeping the cast on their toes for the majority of the running time with little
lull in proceedings. He knows what he wants from the screen and proceeds to ring
every ounce of detail from the sets. This is gothic but like audiences had never
seen before - brought to life in vivid colour almost fairytale-like. The entrance of Dracula,
silhouetted at the top of a staircase, is fantastic horror imagery. Credit must
also be given to cinematographer Jack Asher who brings to life the sets and
embraces the novel use of colour - Dracula's fangs have never dripped blood as
crimson and as pure as they do here. Sangster's script is economical and manages to
streamline Bram Stoker's book, admittedly not being a very faithful adaptation
and taking a few liberties with plot elements. James Bernard produces another of
his fine scores here with the signature theme for Dracula being one of his most
famous pieces.
Verdict
Horror of Dracula is a landmark Hammer film, more importantly so than
The Curse of Frankenstein because of the increased focus on sexuality in
horror. What we know as the norm was risqué material in 1958 and it's thanks to
the likes of Horror of Dracula that the genre we know today is what it is.
It's possibly the best teaming of Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee in two of
their most iconic roles and is,
quite frankly, one of my country's finest horror films. Scratch that, it's one
of the genre's finest horror films too.