Plot
By day, Dr Orloff is a respected
physician helping the less-than-fortunate patients who flock to him in 19th
century London. But by night, he is Jack the Ripper, a deranged killer who
murders prostitutes. Scotland Yard are baffled and the Chief Inspector allows
his girlfriend to step in as bait to trap the killer once and for all.
Review
Apart from using the name of Jack the Ripper, you'd
be hard-pressed to find anything to do with the real murders in this rather
sleazy outing from notorious exploitation director Jess Franco.
Re-writing the Ripper's history? Making a sequel to the
original Ripper murders? Cashing in on the name of Jack the Ripper? Whatever the director had in mine for this flick, he
certainly never intended it to be historically accurate so any Ripper purists
will be best advised to skip this. However Franco revels in his usual perverted, sordid and violent approach to the subject
matter by creating arguably one of his most well-made films.
The plot is actually coherent
enough to keep the film going even though there's no mystery in the film to
uncover. Right from the opening scene we're shown who the Ripper is which is a
bit of a shame because the film can't go down the "whodunit" route. Once the
audience know who the killer is, it's up to the rest of the characters in the
film to play catch up. This cuts out any potential interest we have in the
murder mystery side of the story as we wait impatiently for the characters to
finally surmise who is doing the killing. The script doesn't do the film any
favours with this surprising choice either. You'd have thought that since we
know who the killer is, the film may spend the time it's saved on keeping his
identity secret by delving a little deeper into his psyche. But the Ripper
doesn't get too fleshed out as a character. We know his mother was a prostitute
and this is why he targets them for death. But we never really get into his
head. The script assumes that the scraps we're given about his past will be
enough to tide us over. All he pretty much does in the film is kill, rape and
run away. Without the "whodunit" and without any real character development, a
lot of the film is sluggish because there's little to fill up the screen time.
At least the film looks good. The Swiss locations double nicely for 19th century
London and he gets good mileage out of the traditional fog-drenched streets so
associated with the Ripper era.
The film only works whenever Dr
Orloff is around, mainly due to the excellent performance from the
often-unhinged Klaus Kinski. He
adds a touch of class to proceedings as the Ripper and his odd, piercing
facial expressions certainly give the character a more unusual edge than your
regular murderer.
The anger, the menace and the evil that Kinski can convey with his eyes is
fantastic. It's like the guy is always thinking about killing someone, even when
he's supposed to be playing it straight during the day as a good-natured doctor.
He plays both sides of his mental state well. I can't discuss a Franco film
without covering his usual obsession with sadism and sexuality. Sex and
violence usually go hand-in-hand in Franco's films and there's no better example
of it than here. The
Ripper has a tendency to rip off his victim's clothes before killing them
and then he usually has sex with them after they are dead or dying.
The murders are bloody and brutal as Franco
loves letting the camera linger over the carnage. This Ripper is intent on
not only killing his victims but literally ripping them apart with his knife.
His frenzied attacks are chilling and all played out in graphic detail.
Verdict
Jack the Ripper isn't the best
film based on the notorious murderer but it may be the most violent. It's not
classy and it's not factual but what you'd come to expect from a man like Franco
at the helm - nudity, gore and violence.