Plot
A team of British archaeologists discover the untouched tomb of
ancient Egyptian Princess Ananka.
They are warned not to disturb the tomb but don't heed the advice and a terrible
curse befalls them. Three years later back in England, the curse comes to life
in graphic fashion as the undead guardian of the tomb comes to reek vengeance
upon those who desecrated the tomb.
Review
After tackling Frankenstein and Dracula and giving the old guard
a new lease of cinematic life in lavish technicolour, Hammer turned to another
of the famous Universal monsters for their next film. Brought to life with the
same Gothic atmosphere and graphically violent approach as it's predecessors,
The Mummy is arguably the lesser of the three which is hardly something to
worry about since the other films were genre-defining classics. Even more so
since this one doesn't technically remake Boris Karloff's 1932 version of The
Mummy and has more in line with it's sequel, The Mummy's Hand, in
which the bandaged creature is given iconic screen time. Basically taking all of
the elements that would work from the Universal series and bundling them all
together in one package, The Mummy has big footsteps to follow in and
almost manages to follow them, but not quite.
Belaying it's low budget, director Terence Fisher brings to life
this fantastical tale through a variety of amazing sets. From the ancient
Egyptian mummy's tomb right through to the eerie swamps in which it's
resurrected, the sets are bursting to life with detail, all astutely picked up
on by Fisher. He rings every last drop out of the budget, transporting the
viewer back to a recognisable era of discovery and mystery. The swamp set
provides the film with it's greatest moment, that of the mummy rising up from
the murky depths, slowly writhing and wriggling it's way to the bubbling
surface. The presentation of the film oozes the Hammer vibe but it's remarkable
how different this feels to both The Curse of Frankenstein and The
Horror of Dracula. It feels fresher, more modern and a little more exciting
and unpredictable. That's not to say it isn't predictable. Everything pans out
the way it should for a mummy film with secondary characters not making it to
the final reel and such like. It does take a while to get going though as the
story needs establishing before the mummy can arise. There is a lengthy flashback to ancient Egypt in the
middle of the film and it is just that - lengthy. It's quite unnecessary to take up as
much time as it does and a few cuts here and there would have quickened the pace
up at a crucial point just after the mummy has claimed his first
victim. Instead this acts like a speed bump, putting the brakes on momentum that
the film is building and then letting it build again.
Peter Cushing stars as John Banning and....well it's Peter
Cushing. You shouldn't need an introduction to him if you're even a part-time
horror fan. It's hardly Cushing's best performance, certainly the worst of the
"big three" Hammer horror originals but that was because both Van Helsing and
Frankenstein are generally more iconic and unmistakable characters from
literature. Banning is simply just a normal man written for the purpose of the
film. Cushing does what he does and it's great to see him in his prime when he
was able to tussle and roll around in the thick of the action. Never really an
action man, Cushing handles the action scenes well but, as always, saves the
best moments for his verbal exchanges with other characters.
A testament to his talent, Christopher Lee brings
to life the mummy solely through mannerisms and use of his eyes. The monster is
ruthless, almost stealth-like in it's methods but at the same time there is an
eternal aurora of tragedy surrounding it. The audience knows that his only crime
in his previous life was love and thus the monster is sympathetic. Having said
that, during the scenes in which the monster powerfully strides across the
screen, smashing doors open and choking the life out of it's victims, it's hard
to feel anything but outright fear. Lee's physical presence makes for a
formidable monster. The make-up effects do their job too. We all
know that he's a guy in bandages but there are some memorable visuals involving the
mummy, notably the previously mentioned one in which he rises up from the swamp. George Pastell deserves a mention as Mehemet Bey,
the Egyptian who commands the mummy. He's undeniably sneaky and shares the
film's best scene with Cushing as the two men verbally spar off against each
other: Cushing trying to provoke him into revealing more about himself and
Pastell passionately talking about his religion and beliefs. The script is
really sharp here but it's the delivery which makes it work.
Verdict
Complete with great performances, a strong plot, good special effects and a
sharp script for it's day, The Mummy is one of Hammer's best films and
easily the best mummy film to date. It's just lacking that little bit of spark
which would turn it into a genre classic. Being overshadowed by two such genre
classics doesn't do it any favours though as expectations are high going in and
there's no way that it could top The Curse of Frankenstein or The
Horror of Dracula.