Screamers
2: The Hunting
(2009)
Director:
Sheldon Wilson
Starring: Gina
Holden, Greg Bryk
Run Time: 95 mins
Certificate: 18
Plot Outline: A distress signal is received from Sirius 6B, previously
thought to have become a lost colony after the screamers wiped out the human
population, and a team is sent to investigate and retrieve any survivors. The
team only has a small window in which to conduct any rescue as a meteor storm is
heading to destroy the planet. When they arrive, they find that the screamers
have evolved into something much more sinister and much more deadly.
The Review: The current trend for random sequels to long-forgotten films
continues with Screamers 2: The Hunting. The original Screamers is
something of a minor cult classic featuring Peter Weller and a host of spherical
killer machines. It didn't do that well when it got released and has long been
consigned to the vaults. I didn't think it was that good in all honesty - there
was a good film waiting to come out but it was too talky and dragged too much to
be consistently entertaining. It had a decent enough plot to carry the film and
was helped by a strong performance by Peter Weller. This is exactly the opposite - it's a lot faster paced, has more action, more gore and is generally more
exciting but features less talented actors, a half-assed story and as many
clichés as you can shake a stick at.
Screamers 2: The Hunting sticks rigidly to the
classic Aliens formula about a group of soldiers being sent to a remote planet
where they're all killed off. If you've seen one "group of people getting picked
off by something deadly" feature then you've seen them all unfortunately. You'll know who is
going to live and die - the token expendable black guy makes an appearance here!
Two crew members decide to have sex for no other reason than to provide the film
with it's token love scene. There are characters who do silly things to further
the plot. There are other characters who hide secrets from everyone else which
is a tad annoying given that the secrets always make things worse at the wrong
moment. I'll at least give the film credit for trying to stick as close to the
original as possible in terms of continuation. This feels more like a proper
follow-up which builds on the original as opposed to a shameless sequel that
literally remakes the original with a lower budget. It has the same vibe as the
original and uses similar settings and sets. Clearly we get the sense that this
is still the same planet. The screamers, in their original form, look as unique
and deadly as always. They whizz through the ground in packs to attack and then
fly through the air, slicing and dicing their victims until they've been
shredded to pieces. Needless to say this leads to plenty of gore and
dismemberment - I'm actually quite pleased by the amount of blood on display
here. The first part of the film continues along the same lines as the original
with the soldiers and screamers doing battle numerous times, resulting in lots
of firefights and explosions. It's all a bit too routine for my liking. The new
version of the screamers taking human form seems to be that good old chestnut of
writers taking an easy (and cheaper) route by having their screen menace played
by humans instead of costly special effects. The change between small spherical
objects into tall humans seems a little far fetched and the film doesn't do a
good job of explaining the miraculous change in physics. The human screamers
tend to stay human a lot of the time but when they do reveal themselves, at
least the make-up effects are convincing enough. I believe there was little CGI,
if any, used in these close-ups of the mandibles and mechanical jaws opening.
The film shifts from action to more horror-orientated when the human screamers
are revealed too which makes a nice change of pace.
Lance Henriksen is given a token cameo role here as
the man who designed the screamers and is locked away in his little laboratory
on the planet. He really needed a bigger role here and he really needed to
appear a lot earlier in the film (it's about an hour in when he makes his first
appearance). He adds his usual screen presence but the words "phone-in" come to
mind when I think of his performance. The character is simply there to explain
the plot to the audience and provide the back story and answers to a lot of
questions. Peter Weller made the first film but at least he was in the main
role. Henriksen could have made this film if he'd have been given a more meaty
part. Gina Holden acts with her looks (which are very good by the way) but fails
to really get to grips with supposedly portraying a soldier. Greg Bryk plays the
token slime ball character who makes things a lot worse for the soldiers by
reactivating the screamers. It's not worth really mentioning anyone else because
you could edit footage of any secondary character from these type of movies with
another film and still not be any the wiser. To be fair, no one gets a good
chance to display any sort of talent as their characters are so poorly written
and the dialogue is pretty banal. But at least give it a shot guys! We like to
see someone trying!
Final Verdict: Screamers 2: The Hunting takes
liberties with the likes of Aliens and The Terminator to conjure
up a "best of" feature, containing as much as the writers could get away with
stealing and re-imagining. It's not a bad sequel in all honesty and was
entertaining enough for me not to keep clock watching. But we've been there and
done it so many times that I feel like I'm repeating myself in
these reviews.
Rating: