Plot
Dr Maitland collects curios and
artefacts of the occult from across the globe to help him with his research. On
one night, his disreputable source offers him the chance of a lifetime - to own
the skull of the Marquis de Sade. Previous owners of the skull had suffered
unpleasant fates but Maitland dismisses the rumours as nonsense designed to make
the sale more lucrative and essential. He eventually gives in and takes
possession of the skull. Slowly but surely, he begins to lose his mind as he is
possessed by an evil force which threatens to destroy him and those around him.
Review
Amicus are better known for their anthology horror films but
they did make a handful of stand alone horror films and attempted to
differentiate themselves from Hammer back in the day by not setting them in
Hammer's traditional period settings. Instead, a lot of the Amicus films were
set in contemporary time, mainly so that the viewer would hopefully be able to associate
themselves more with what was going on. Although some of the anthologies were
good, Amicus were never able to capture the essence of what the Hammer films
were so good at. Indeed, a lot of these Amicus productions seem slow, plodding
and with very little to talk about on screen. Their stand alone efforts seem
like some of the short anthology stories were dragged out into feature length
films - clearly something like this could have been trimmed down into a fifteen
minute segment for Dr Terror's House of Horrors or one of their other
anthologies.
This is the main problem in that the story
just isn't really interesting enough to captivate the audience and hold their
interest. Little else happens in the film barring what is in the description on
the DVD cover. At 83 minutes, even that seems stretched out and padded out with
filler material. Apparently the final script only ran for around about 53 pages
which was nowhere near enough for a feature length film so lots of extra scenes
were added to pad out the running time - and it blatantly shows. The skull itself doesn't look intimidating and
attempts are made to give it a bit of character including POV shots from the
skull. It even floats around from time to time, looking like a cheap prop from a
school Halloween production. An idea would have been to give the film the illusion
that the skull isn't actually doing anything and it's all a figment of
Maitland's imagination that he has been possessed. I wish they'd have stuck with this more psychological
approach instead of relying on silly floating skulls! The script never really
explains too much about the skull and why it has been possessed by the Marquis
de Sade and why it comes to possess others. There are times when the film
borders on genius - the is-it-a-dream-or-isn't-it finale in which Maitland is
escorted by two police offers to see a judge who then forces him to play Russian
roulette - but one wonders whether these moments were stumbled upon by mistake
given how droll and bland the rest of the film is.
As much a load of rubbish as The Skull is, at
least it's one of the rare occasions in which Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee
starred in speaking roles opposite each other. Cushing is simply a marvel to
watch. This is his film as you slowly watch him unravel into a man completely
possessed by an evil force. His performance and insanity towards the end of the
film is just intense. The nightmarish finale really gives Cushing the chance
to show off a more explosive, uncontrolled side to him that I can't recall him
using too many times since the BBC's version of Nineteen Eighty-Four went
out in 1954. Lee isn't in the film a lot and is credited as a "guest
star" but manages to boom and bluster his way through most of his scenes with his
usual authority and gusto. The scenes in which the two men share screen time are
great. There's a whole load of other old school British
actors involved here including Peter Woodthorpe, Patrick Magee, Nigel Green, Michael Gough and
Patrick Wymark, particularly memorable as Maitland's shady associate, Marco.
Verdict
The Skull is exactly the sort of film that I have come to
associate with Amicus - decent but not memorable in the slightest. It's good in
small doses but there just isn't enough to stretch out for a full length
feature. A criminal waste of Cushing's talent!